<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (6) TMI 65 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296285</link>
    <description>A proclamation under the Code of Criminal Procedure was held invalid where it required the accused to appear within thirty days from the date of the proclamation, instead of thirty days from the date of publication. The statutory requirement was treated as mandatory, so non-compliance with the correct starting point could not be treated as a mere irregularity capable of cure under the Code. The proclamation was therefore quashed, and the revision petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (6) TMI 65 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296285</link>
      <description>A proclamation under the Code of Criminal Procedure was held invalid where it required the accused to appear within thirty days from the date of the proclamation, instead of thirty days from the date of publication. The statutory requirement was treated as mandatory, so non-compliance with the correct starting point could not be treated as a mere irregularity capable of cure under the Code. The proclamation was therefore quashed, and the revision petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>