<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 385 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296284</link>
    <description>Proclamation and attachment under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 require recorded judicial satisfaction on objective material that the accused has absconded or is concealing himself; they cannot be ordered mechanically or without preserving the foundational orders on record. On the facts, the proclamation and attachment proceedings were quashed and the attached property was directed to be released. The court also allowed the applicant to surrender before the Sessions Judge, Dehradun within one month for expeditious consideration of bail, and vacated the contempt notice against the Chief Judicial Magistrate after the apology and surrounding circumstances were taken into account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 385 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296284</link>
      <description>Proclamation and attachment under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 require recorded judicial satisfaction on objective material that the accused has absconded or is concealing himself; they cannot be ordered mechanically or without preserving the foundational orders on record. On the facts, the proclamation and attachment proceedings were quashed and the attached property was directed to be released. The court also allowed the applicant to surrender before the Sessions Judge, Dehradun within one month for expeditious consideration of bail, and vacated the contempt notice against the Chief Judicial Magistrate after the apology and surrounding circumstances were taken into account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>