<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409630</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) does not qualify as an &#039;instrumentality of State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution. As a result, the petition filed against GJEPC was deemed not maintainable under Article 226 and was dismissed. The petitioner was granted the liberty to pursue other legal remedies available to address the termination of her employment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 472 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409630</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) does not qualify as an &#039;instrumentality of State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution. As a result, the petition filed against GJEPC was deemed not maintainable under Article 226 and was dismissed. The petitioner was granted the liberty to pursue other legal remedies available to address the termination of her employment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>