<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 454 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. It was established that the assessee had provided all necessary details, and the discrepancy arose from the Assessing Officer allowing more depreciation than claimed. The Tribunal found no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 454 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. It was established that the assessee had provided all necessary details, and the discrepancy arose from the Assessing Officer allowing more depreciation than claimed. The Tribunal found no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>