<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 453 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction for dividend income from SBI mutual fund under section 80P(2) as the investment of surplus funds was considered part of banking business. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to allow rectification of registration category for claiming TDS benefits, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no remedy existed for the registration mistake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:36:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 453 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction for dividend income from SBI mutual fund under section 80P(2) as the investment of surplus funds was considered part of banking business. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to allow rectification of registration category for claiming TDS benefits, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no remedy existed for the registration mistake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>