<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25947</link>
    <description>A revisional authority cannot disturb an assessment order that was passed solely to implement binding Tribunal directions, and a limitation challenge fails where the revision is directed at that implementing order rather than the earlier assessment. The text also states that bonus paid in the relevant previous year is deductible under section 8(9) if it is revenue expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for earning agricultural income, even when the bonus relates to earlier accounting years. On this reasoning, the revisional disallowance is said to be erroneous and the assessee&#039;s deduction claim is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25947</link>
      <description>A revisional authority cannot disturb an assessment order that was passed solely to implement binding Tribunal directions, and a limitation challenge fails where the revision is directed at that implementing order rather than the earlier assessment. The text also states that bonus paid in the relevant previous year is deductible under section 8(9) if it is revenue expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for earning agricultural income, even when the bonus relates to earlier accounting years. On this reasoning, the revisional disallowance is said to be erroneous and the assessee&#039;s deduction claim is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>