<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 442 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) of the I.T. Act should be allowed as the donation was made when the payee organization had valid approval. The Tribunal emphasized that the withdrawal of approval by the CBDT occurred after the donation was made, and the assessee could not have foreseen this withdrawal. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 442 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) of the I.T. Act should be allowed as the donation was made when the payee organization had valid approval. The Tribunal emphasized that the withdrawal of approval by the CBDT occurred after the donation was made, and the assessee could not have foreseen this withdrawal. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>