<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 441 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 3,35,707/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly specify the charge in the &quot;Show Cause&quot; notice, violating Section 274(1) of the Act. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal refrained from assessing the merits of the case, leaving them open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 441 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 3,35,707/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to clearly specify the charge in the &quot;Show Cause&quot; notice, violating Section 274(1) of the Act. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal refrained from assessing the merits of the case, leaving them open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>