<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25946</link>
    <description>Depreciation on agricultural implements was held to be allowable on the original cost of the assets rather than on the reduced written-down value. Expenses on guest houses, trucks and cars were deductible except to the extent already attributable to personal expenditure, which remained disallowed. The statutory previous year for assessment governed, so the assessment period ended on 31 March and not the assessee&#039;s accounting year ending on 30 June. Litigation expenses incurred to resist land ceiling proceedings were treated as revenue expenditure because they were incurred to preserve an existing capital asset, and were therefore deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25946</link>
      <description>Depreciation on agricultural implements was held to be allowable on the original cost of the assets rather than on the reduced written-down value. Expenses on guest houses, trucks and cars were deductible except to the extent already attributable to personal expenditure, which remained disallowed. The statutory previous year for assessment governed, so the assessment period ended on 31 March and not the assessee&#039;s accounting year ending on 30 June. Litigation expenses incurred to resist land ceiling proceedings were treated as revenue expenditure because they were incurred to preserve an existing capital asset, and were therefore deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>