<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1226 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296269</link>
    <description>Grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires judicial consideration of the nature and gravity of the accusation, the severity of punishment, prima facie material, the likelihood of absconding, and the risk of witness intimidation. Appellate interference is warranted where relevant factors are ignored or irrelevant considerations dominate. Here, the High Court relied mainly on custody of about 75 days and a territorial restriction, but did not adequately assess the murder allegation, eye-witness material, alleged abscondence, possible witness influence, or the Sessions Court&#039;s reasons. The bail order was therefore set aside and the accused taken into custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1226 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296269</link>
      <description>Grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires judicial consideration of the nature and gravity of the accusation, the severity of punishment, prima facie material, the likelihood of absconding, and the risk of witness intimidation. Appellate interference is warranted where relevant factors are ignored or irrelevant considerations dominate. Here, the High Court relied mainly on custody of about 75 days and a territorial restriction, but did not adequately assess the murder allegation, eye-witness material, alleged abscondence, possible witness influence, or the Sessions Court&#039;s reasons. The bail order was therefore set aside and the accused taken into custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>