https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296260 The court addressed a petition seeking permanent status confirmation with respondent no.4 council after the closure of the unit where the petitioner was employed. The petitioner claimed to have not received closure compensation despite being entitled to it. The court reviewed the petitioner's employment history and directed both parties to file necessary documents and counter affidavits. The case was scheduled for further proceedings to resolve the dispute over permanent status confirmation and closure compensation. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:55:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296260 The court addressed a petition seeking permanent status confirmation with respondent no.4 council after the closure of the unit where the petitioner was employed. The petitioner claimed to have not received closure compensation despite being entitled to it. The court reviewed the petitioner's employment history and directed both parties to file necessary documents and counter affidavits. The case was scheduled for further proceedings to resolve the dispute over permanent status confirmation and closure compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296260