<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 216 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296254</link>
    <description>The court found that the plaintiff&#039;s termination was illegal due to management&#039;s fraudulent alteration of records. The plaintiff was awarded damages of Rs. 1,472 for wrongful termination from October 1959 to June 1961. However, the court denied the plaintiff&#039;s request for reinstatement and declaration of continued employment, stating that specific performance of a contract of personal service is generally not enforceable in contractual employment cases. The court emphasized that damages were the appropriate remedy for wrongful termination, and the plaintiff was granted full costs due to the management&#039;s misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 216 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296254</link>
      <description>The court found that the plaintiff&#039;s termination was illegal due to management&#039;s fraudulent alteration of records. The plaintiff was awarded damages of Rs. 1,472 for wrongful termination from October 1959 to June 1961. However, the court denied the plaintiff&#039;s request for reinstatement and declaration of continued employment, stating that specific performance of a contract of personal service is generally not enforceable in contractual employment cases. The court emphasized that damages were the appropriate remedy for wrongful termination, and the plaintiff was granted full costs due to the management&#039;s misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>