<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1131 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296245</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that only the net amount of receipts from job works should be excluded under section 80HHC, not the gross amount. The High Court&#039;s decision to exclude the entire amount was overturned, emphasizing the distinction between gross and net receipts. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reassessment in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, ultimately favoring the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1131 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296245</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that only the net amount of receipts from job works should be excluded under section 80HHC, not the gross amount. The High Court&#039;s decision to exclude the entire amount was overturned, emphasizing the distinction between gross and net receipts. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reassessment in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, ultimately favoring the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>