<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 4 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25938</link>
    <description>Official records are generally disclosable, but public interest privilege may justify withholding material where production would harm effective administration of public law. In tax-evasion matters, the court recognised a substantial public interest in protecting informants&#039; anonymity and preserving the flow of confidential intelligence to revenue authorities, and held that disclosure should be refused when that balance favours non-disclosure. The same judgment also found no sufficient ground to quash criminal process in a defamation complaint, noting the challenge was raised belatedly and no prima facie basis for interference was shown at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:35:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 4 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25938</link>
      <description>Official records are generally disclosable, but public interest privilege may justify withholding material where production would harm effective administration of public law. In tax-evasion matters, the court recognised a substantial public interest in protecting informants&#039; anonymity and preserving the flow of confidential intelligence to revenue authorities, and held that disclosure should be refused when that balance favours non-disclosure. The same judgment also found no sufficient ground to quash criminal process in a defamation complaint, noting the challenge was raised belatedly and no prima facie basis for interference was shown at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>