<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1944 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296234</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged the assessment order issued under Section 147 without the mandatory Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. They argued for the quashing of the order due to various irregularities including violation of scrutiny norms, lack of proper jurisdiction of the assessing officer, absence of statutory notice under Section 143(2), assessment passed beyond the limitation period, incorrect addition made by the Assessing Officer, lack of proper opportunity of hearing provided by the CIT (A), and a delay in filing the appeal which was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s medical condition. The delay in filing the appeal was ultimately condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1944 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296234</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged the assessment order issued under Section 147 without the mandatory Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. They argued for the quashing of the order due to various irregularities including violation of scrutiny norms, lack of proper jurisdiction of the assessing officer, absence of statutory notice under Section 143(2), assessment passed beyond the limitation period, incorrect addition made by the Assessing Officer, lack of proper opportunity of hearing provided by the CIT (A), and a delay in filing the appeal which was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s medical condition. The delay in filing the appeal was ultimately condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>