https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296230 In a suit for specific performance, impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is limited to parties against whom relief is sought or whose presence is necessary for an effective decree. A stranger claiming independent and adverse title and possession over the contracted property is neither a necessary nor a proper party, because Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act confines enforceability to the contractual parties and persons falling within its specified categories. Adding such a third party would impermissibly expand the suit into a collateral title dispute. The plaintiff, as dominus litis, cannot be compelled to litigate against an adverse claimant with no direct contractual interest. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 May 2024 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296230 In a suit for specific performance, impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is limited to parties against whom relief is sought or whose presence is necessary for an effective decree. A stranger claiming independent and adverse title and possession over the contracted property is neither a necessary nor a proper party, because Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act confines enforceability to the contractual parties and persons falling within its specified categories. Adding such a third party would impermissibly expand the suit into a collateral title dispute. The plaintiff, as dominus litis, cannot be compelled to litigate against an adverse claimant with no direct contractual interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296230