<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 766 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The assessment order under Section 158BD was quashed due to an invalid notice and improper satisfaction note recording. The addition of undisclosed income was deemed unjustified on merits, as no incriminating material was found during the search, and transactions were properly recorded. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition, finding no basis for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 11:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 766 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The assessment order under Section 158BD was quashed due to an invalid notice and improper satisfaction note recording. The addition of undisclosed income was deemed unjustified on merits, as no incriminating material was found during the search, and transactions were properly recorded. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition, finding no basis for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>