<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409536</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the suspension of the Customs Broker License under Regulation 16(2) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018 was dismissed. The tribunal upheld the suspension, finding that the Commissioner acted within the regulatory framework after providing the appellant with a hearing opportunity. The tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting obligations under Regulation 10 of CBLR, 2018 for maintaining customs integrity. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of delay in issuing the suspension order, the tribunal deemed the timing appropriate to prevent further misuse of the license. The suspension was considered a precautionary measure pending ongoing proceedings under Regulation 14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409536</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the suspension of the Customs Broker License under Regulation 16(2) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018 was dismissed. The tribunal upheld the suspension, finding that the Commissioner acted within the regulatory framework after providing the appellant with a hearing opportunity. The tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting obligations under Regulation 10 of CBLR, 2018 for maintaining customs integrity. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of delay in issuing the suspension order, the tribunal deemed the timing appropriate to prevent further misuse of the license. The suspension was considered a precautionary measure pending ongoing proceedings under Regulation 14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>