<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 364 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409522</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the reassessment under section 147 was invalid as it was solely based on information already disclosed during the original assessment. Emphasizing the necessity of fresh information or new facts for a valid reassessment, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and deemed the assessee&#039;s cross objection infructuous. The decision highlighted that reassessment cannot be merely a change of opinion without new material justifying income escapement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 364 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409522</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the reassessment under section 147 was invalid as it was solely based on information already disclosed during the original assessment. Emphasizing the necessity of fresh information or new facts for a valid reassessment, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and deemed the assessee&#039;s cross objection infructuous. The decision highlighted that reassessment cannot be merely a change of opinion without new material justifying income escapement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>