https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296211 The appeal against an order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving an Operational Creditor and a Corporate Debtor, was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific written objections to raise disputes effectively, citing the lack of such objections by the Corporate Debtor regarding the services provided. The decision in "Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd v. Kirusa Software Private Ltd" was referenced to support this interpretation. Despite the dismissal, no costs were awarded, emphasizing the importance of clear objections in challenging claims under the insolvency framework. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 08:38:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296211 The appeal against an order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving an Operational Creditor and a Corporate Debtor, was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific written objections to raise disputes effectively, citing the lack of such objections by the Corporate Debtor regarding the services provided. The decision in "Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd v. Kirusa Software Private Ltd" was referenced to support this interpretation. Despite the dismissal, no costs were awarded, emphasizing the importance of clear objections in challenging claims under the insolvency framework. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296211