<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Allows 99-Year Lease Expense Deduction for 2007-2008, Deems It Fully for Business Purposes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58711</link>
    <description>Deduction of lease rent - lumpsum amount paid by the appellant/assessee for the entire tenure of the lease i.e. 99 years - matching principle - Given the facts obtaining in this case, the matching principle would have no applicability. The appellant/assessee chose to incur the liability of a crystallised amount in the period relevant to the AY in issue i.e. AY 2007-2008, and therefore, it was entitled to seek deduction of the amount which fulfilled the attributes - The expenditure was not in the nature of capital expenditure or a personal expense, It was expended fully and exclusively for the purposes of the business and; It did not fall within the realm of any provision of the Act which prohibited the appellant/assessee from claiming this deduction - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 19:33:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 19:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Allows 99-Year Lease Expense Deduction for 2007-2008, Deems It Fully for Business Purposes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58711</link>
      <description>Deduction of lease rent - lumpsum amount paid by the appellant/assessee for the entire tenure of the lease i.e. 99 years - matching principle - Given the facts obtaining in this case, the matching principle would have no applicability. The appellant/assessee chose to incur the liability of a crystallised amount in the period relevant to the AY in issue i.e. AY 2007-2008, and therefore, it was entitled to seek deduction of the amount which fulfilled the attributes - The expenditure was not in the nature of capital expenditure or a personal expense, It was expended fully and exclusively for the purposes of the business and; It did not fall within the realm of any provision of the Act which prohibited the appellant/assessee from claiming this deduction - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 19:33:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>