<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Premature EDD Recovery Order; Respondents Should Have Awaited CESTAT Appeal Outcome.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58703</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment - Recovery of Refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) - this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order issued on 08.01.2013 ought not to have issued by the respondents and they should have waited till the disposal of the CESTAT Appeal filed by the petitioner, which is pending. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 18:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 18:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Premature EDD Recovery Order; Respondents Should Have Awaited CESTAT Appeal Outcome.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58703</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment - Recovery of Refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) - this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order issued on 08.01.2013 ought not to have issued by the respondents and they should have waited till the disposal of the CESTAT Appeal filed by the petitioner, which is pending. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 18:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>