<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 8 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25918</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction of wealth-tax liabilities in computing taxable wealth. The court held that wealth-tax liability crystallizes on the valuation date, and debts owed by the assessee can be deducted, even if not quantified or accepted by the assessee on that date. Citing Supreme Court decisions, the High Court emphasized that tax liabilities that crystallize on the valuation date should be deducted, regardless of the finalization of assessment orders. The court concluded in favor of the assessee, stating that liabilities determined by the ultimate judicial authority on the valuation date should be considered for deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 8 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25918</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction of wealth-tax liabilities in computing taxable wealth. The court held that wealth-tax liability crystallizes on the valuation date, and debts owed by the assessee can be deducted, even if not quantified or accepted by the assessee on that date. Citing Supreme Court decisions, the High Court emphasized that tax liabilities that crystallize on the valuation date should be deducted, regardless of the finalization of assessment orders. The court concluded in favor of the assessee, stating that liabilities determined by the ultimate judicial authority on the valuation date should be considered for deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>