<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25917</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61 were invalid. The Court found that the discrepancies in the names on the notices were not mere technical errors and rendered the reassessment proceedings void and illegal. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing that the defective notices could not be rectified by filing returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25917</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61 were invalid. The Court found that the discrepancies in the names on the notices were not mere technical errors and rendered the reassessment proceedings void and illegal. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing that the defective notices could not be rectified by filing returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>