<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409499</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed for loss of inputs that is intrinsic to the manufacturing process, because the statutory restriction on goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or given away applies to identifiable losses typically caused by external factors. Loss arising from consumption during manufacture stands on a different footing and is not the kind of loss covered by the provision. Treating the TNVAT restriction as in pari materia with the GST provision, the court applied the same construction and held that reversal of credit for manufacturing loss was unwarranted; the assessment orders were set aside to that extent in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409499</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed for loss of inputs that is intrinsic to the manufacturing process, because the statutory restriction on goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or given away applies to identifiable losses typically caused by external factors. Loss arising from consumption during manufacture stands on a different footing and is not the kind of loss covered by the provision. Treating the TNVAT restriction as in pari materia with the GST provision, the court applied the same construction and held that reversal of credit for manufacturing loss was unwarranted; the assessment orders were set aside to that extent in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>