<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409488</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, permitting the petitioners to instruct the Bank for the closure and refund of balances without assessing authority approval. The court emphasized the contractual relationship between the petitioners and the Bank in managing the accounts, directing the Bank to honor the closure and refund requests in accordance with contract terms without requiring Form-G approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 330 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409488</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, permitting the petitioners to instruct the Bank for the closure and refund of balances without assessing authority approval. The court emphasized the contractual relationship between the petitioners and the Bank in managing the accounts, directing the Bank to honor the closure and refund requests in accordance with contract terms without requiring Form-G approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>