https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409485 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order-in-appeal and restoring the order-in-original. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as the method of stock verification was deemed flawed, and the explanations for the shortage were considered reasonable. The demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were unjustified due to lack of corroborative evidence of clandestine removal. en-us Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:32:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409485 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order-in-appeal and restoring the order-in-original. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as the method of stock verification was deemed flawed, and the explanations for the shortage were considered reasonable. The demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were unjustified due to lack of corroborative evidence of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409485