<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296194</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that discrepancies in professional receipts and interest income were due to professional errors and not deliberate concealment. Penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296194</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that discrepancies in professional receipts and interest income were due to professional errors and not deliberate concealment. Penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>