<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1411 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for Central Excise Registration approval to reconsider and provide reasons for excluding the Single Buoy Mooring area from the ground plan. The Appellant was granted a personal hearing opportunity, stressing the significance of providing clear justifications for decisions in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1411 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for Central Excise Registration approval to reconsider and provide reasons for excluding the Single Buoy Mooring area from the ground plan. The Appellant was granted a personal hearing opportunity, stressing the significance of providing clear justifications for decisions in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>