https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296195 Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review of a signed judgment or final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, but that bar does not prevent recall of an ex parte criminal order passed without hearing the affected party. The distinction between a prohibited review on merits and a permissible recall for procedural defect was applied to protect the hearing requirement under Section 401 CrPC and prevent failure of justice. On that basis, the recall application was maintainable and allowed, the ex parte order was recalled, and the matter was directed to be listed afresh with the connected revision. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:32:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296195 Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review of a signed judgment or final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, but that bar does not prevent recall of an ex parte criminal order passed without hearing the affected party. The distinction between a prohibited review on merits and a permissible recall for procedural defect was applied to protect the hearing requirement under Section 401 CrPC and prevent failure of justice. On that basis, the recall application was maintainable and allowed, the ex parte order was recalled, and the matter was directed to be listed afresh with the connected revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296195