<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 369,850 as unexplained investment. The appellant justified the cash payment for a car through explained agricultural and dairy income sources, supported by financial statements. The Tribunal found the explanation reasonable, directing the deletion of the addition as the investment was not from undisclosed sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 08:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 369,850 as unexplained investment. The appellant justified the cash payment for a car through explained agricultural and dairy income sources, supported by financial statements. The Tribunal found the explanation reasonable, directing the deletion of the addition as the investment was not from undisclosed sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>