<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 274 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the forfeited amount of Rs. 3 crores was not taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act and should reduce the cost of the property under Section 51. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, directing the AO to delete the impugned addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 274 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the forfeited amount of Rs. 3 crores was not taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act and should reduce the cost of the property under Section 51. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, directing the AO to delete the impugned addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>