<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409427</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of rent payment to OPC Asset Solutions Private Limited and remitting the issue of professional fees paid to Ms. Namrata Goel and Ms. Nidhi Goel back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The ITAT held that the rent payments were genuine and for business purposes, emphasizing that the revenue authority cannot determine the deduction amount. The order was pronounced on 28th June 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=649007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409427</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of rent payment to OPC Asset Solutions Private Limited and remitting the issue of professional fees paid to Ms. Namrata Goel and Ms. Nidhi Goel back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The ITAT held that the rent payments were genuine and for business purposes, emphasizing that the revenue authority cannot determine the deduction amount. The order was pronounced on 28th June 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>