<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 260 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409418</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, directing a reevaluation by the Designated Committee. A fresh hearing and verification of records were ordered, with a revised Form SVLDRS-3 to be issued based on the verified payment of Rs. 50,00,000. Procedural fairness and adherence to the SVLDR scheme&#039;s principles were emphasized for accurate determination of tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 260 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409418</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, directing a reevaluation by the Designated Committee. A fresh hearing and verification of records were ordered, with a revised Form SVLDRS-3 to be issued based on the verified payment of Rs. 50,00,000. Procedural fairness and adherence to the SVLDR scheme&#039;s principles were emphasized for accurate determination of tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>