https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409412 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order based on contractual obligations, emphasizing that such disputes require adjudication with evidence not suitable for writ proceedings under Article 226. Despite an 8-year delay since the Credit Limit Application's disposal, the Court did not delve into the merits but noted the need for proper legal action. It reiterated that resolving contractual issues through affidavits in writ petitions is inadequate and advised seeking redress through the appropriate legal forum. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, highlighting the importance of addressing contractual disputes in a more suitable legal setting. en-us Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:11:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409412 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order based on contractual obligations, emphasizing that such disputes require adjudication with evidence not suitable for writ proceedings under Article 226. Despite an 8-year delay since the Credit Limit Application's disposal, the Court did not delve into the merits but noted the need for proper legal action. It reiterated that resolving contractual issues through affidavits in writ petitions is inadequate and advised seeking redress through the appropriate legal forum. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, highlighting the importance of addressing contractual disputes in a more suitable legal setting. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409412