<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 246 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). It held that the amended provision of Section 55A was not applicable to the transaction, rendering the reference to the DVO invalid. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice prevailing over technical considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 246 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). It held that the amended provision of Section 55A was not applicable to the transaction, rendering the reference to the DVO invalid. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice prevailing over technical considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>