<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1510 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296162</link>
    <description>Customs show cause notices alleging misdeclaration of import value may be quashed where adjudication remains pending for an inordinate period and an earlier decision has already granted relief in an identical controversy. Prolonged inaction of about twelve years, coupled with the undisputed applicability of the earlier ruling, resulted in the notice being quashed and the petition being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1510 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296162</link>
      <description>Customs show cause notices alleging misdeclaration of import value may be quashed where adjudication remains pending for an inordinate period and an earlier decision has already granted relief in an identical controversy. Prolonged inaction of about twelve years, coupled with the undisputed applicability of the earlier ruling, resulted in the notice being quashed and the petition being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>