<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 60 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25890</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the deduction of gratuity liability as a revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1967-68, emphasizing that the liability accrued under statutory provisions was deductible. The court upheld the determination of the written down value of fixed assets based on specific exchange rates and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the revision of written down value of assets. Additionally, the court overturned the disallowance of loss on remittance of profits, considering it a legitimate business expenditure. However, expenses incurred due to the devaluation of the Indian rupee were deemed of a capital nature, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:42:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 60 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25890</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the deduction of gratuity liability as a revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1967-68, emphasizing that the liability accrued under statutory provisions was deductible. The court upheld the determination of the written down value of fixed assets based on specific exchange rates and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the revision of written down value of assets. Additionally, the court overturned the disallowance of loss on remittance of profits, considering it a legitimate business expenditure. However, expenses incurred due to the devaluation of the Indian rupee were deemed of a capital nature, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>