<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 663 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296147</link>
    <description>The second appeal was dismissed as the exclusion of a valuable jewel, &quot;Kasu Malai,&quot; from a partition suit was deemed fatal to the case. The court emphasized the importance of including known joint family properties in partition suits, regardless of possession, and overturned the first appellate court&#039;s decision. The trial court&#039;s judgment was confirmed, dismissing the second appeal due to the absence of any substantial legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 13:12:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 663 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296147</link>
      <description>The second appeal was dismissed as the exclusion of a valuable jewel, &quot;Kasu Malai,&quot; from a partition suit was deemed fatal to the case. The court emphasized the importance of including known joint family properties in partition suits, regardless of possession, and overturned the first appellate court&#039;s decision. The trial court&#039;s judgment was confirmed, dismissing the second appeal due to the absence of any substantial legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>