https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296144 In a challenge to rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the HC held that the plaint must be read as a whole and its averments assumed to be true. Rejection is permissible only where no cause of action is disclosed on the plaint itself; the court cannot assess the plaintiff's prospects of success or the sufficiency of proof at that stage. As the pleadings raised disputes requiring evidence and adjudication, the threshold for rejection was not met. The plaint therefore disclosed a cause of action and was not liable to be rejected, and the challenge failed. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jul 2021 11:18:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296144 In a challenge to rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the HC held that the plaint must be read as a whole and its averments assumed to be true. Rejection is permissible only where no cause of action is disclosed on the plaint itself; the court cannot assess the plaintiff's prospects of success or the sufficiency of proof at that stage. As the pleadings raised disputes requiring evidence and adjudication, the threshold for rejection was not met. The plaint therefore disclosed a cause of action and was not liable to be rejected, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296144