<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1225 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296143</link>
    <description>Section 50C permits substitution of declared sale consideration only with the value adopted or assessed by the stamp valuation authority where declared consideration is lower; it does not support an unsupported market-value enhancement without evidence of additional consideration. The capital-gains addition based on an estimated higher rate was therefore deleted. For indexed cost of acquisition, the registered valuer&#039;s supported estimate of the land&#039;s fair market value was accepted because the Revenue&#039;s lower valuation relied on unreliable comparables and lacked adequate supporting material. The assessee&#039;s valuation was consequently adopted for computing capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 11:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1225 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296143</link>
      <description>Section 50C permits substitution of declared sale consideration only with the value adopted or assessed by the stamp valuation authority where declared consideration is lower; it does not support an unsupported market-value enhancement without evidence of additional consideration. The capital-gains addition based on an estimated higher rate was therefore deleted. For indexed cost of acquisition, the registered valuer&#039;s supported estimate of the land&#039;s fair market value was accepted because the Revenue&#039;s lower valuation relied on unreliable comparables and lacked adequate supporting material. The assessee&#039;s valuation was consequently adopted for computing capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>