<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296140</link>
    <description>A public charitable trust can be treated as a juristic person and as a &quot;company&quot; for the purposes of Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, because the term &quot;person&quot; is of inclusive import and Chapter XVII must be read purposively to preserve cheque credibility. On that reasoning, the omission of &quot;trust&quot; from Section 141 was treated as casus omissus, and both a trust with a single trustee and one with multiple trustees were held to fall within its scope. Trustees shown by prima facie averments to be in charge of the trust&#039;s day-to-day affairs can therefore be proceeded against for cheque dishonour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1192 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296140</link>
      <description>A public charitable trust can be treated as a juristic person and as a &quot;company&quot; for the purposes of Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, because the term &quot;person&quot; is of inclusive import and Chapter XVII must be read purposively to preserve cheque credibility. On that reasoning, the omission of &quot;trust&quot; from Section 141 was treated as casus omissus, and both a trust with a single trustee and one with multiple trustees were held to fall within its scope. Trustees shown by prima facie averments to be in charge of the trust&#039;s day-to-day affairs can therefore be proceeded against for cheque dishonour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>