https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409389 The writ court should not decide disputed questions of fact regarding the application of Regulations 9(1) and 9(3) of the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003 when the controversy requires examination of documents and materials unsuitable for writ adjudication. The proper course is for the competent authority to consider the representation, along with supporting documents, on merits and in accordance with law within the time fixed by the court. The court therefore declined to undertake factual adjudication itself and directed administrative consideration of the matter. en-us Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:46:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409389 The writ court should not decide disputed questions of fact regarding the application of Regulations 9(1) and 9(3) of the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003 when the controversy requires examination of documents and materials unsuitable for writ adjudication. The proper course is for the competent authority to consider the representation, along with supporting documents, on merits and in accordance with law within the time fixed by the court. The court therefore declined to undertake factual adjudication itself and directed administrative consideration of the matter. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409389