https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409378 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the reassessment orders for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2011-12 due to the Assessing Officer's failure to comply with mandatory procedures and legal requirements. The Tribunal found that the AO did not follow prescribed procedures, including passing a speaking order on objections raised by the assessee, rendering the assessment orders without jurisdiction. Consequently, the jurisdictional issues and procedural irregularities led to the Tribunal allowing the appeal of the assessee for both assessment years. en-us Mon, 05 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jul 2021 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409378 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the reassessment orders for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2011-12 due to the Assessing Officer's failure to comply with mandatory procedures and legal requirements. The Tribunal found that the AO did not follow prescribed procedures, including passing a speaking order on objections raised by the assessee, rendering the assessment orders without jurisdiction. Consequently, the jurisdictional issues and procedural irregularities led to the Tribunal allowing the appeal of the assessee for both assessment years. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 05 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409378