<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 218 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance of provident fund contribution and delete the entire disallowance under section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the impermissibility of ad-hoc disallowances without proper reasoning and ordered the deletion of the 10% disallowance of various expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 218 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance of provident fund contribution and delete the entire disallowance under section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized the impermissibility of ad-hoc disallowances without proper reasoning and ordered the deletion of the 10% disallowance of various expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>