<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 214 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues of taxability of notional income and calculation of net export incentives back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, following precedent. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted due to a defective penalty notice that did not meet legal standards, in line with a High Court ruling. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 214 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues of taxability of notional income and calculation of net export incentives back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, following precedent. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted due to a defective penalty notice that did not meet legal standards, in line with a High Court ruling. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>