<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 203 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not justified. It found that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries and applied his mind to the issues raised. The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 203 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not justified. It found that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries and applied his mind to the issues raised. The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>