<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 991 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act was not valid for the assessment year 2012-13 as the amended provisions were not applicable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the addition towards long-term capital gains and upholding the fair market value adopted by the assessee based on the government-approved valuer&#039;s report. The order was pronounced on 27/11/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 991 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act was not valid for the assessment year 2012-13 as the amended provisions were not applicable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the addition towards long-term capital gains and upholding the fair market value adopted by the assessee based on the government-approved valuer&#039;s report. The order was pronounced on 27/11/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>