<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 613 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296123</link>
    <description>Permission to sue as an indigent person may be withdrawn under Order XXXIII, Rule 9 CPC where the plaintiff suppresses material assets or makes incorrect disclosures about means. &quot;Sufficient means&quot; includes realizable assets capable of being converted into cash for payment of court fees, not only ready cash. On the material relied upon, the plaintiff had undisclosed inherited immovable property, admitted shares of value, and income from tuition work, while the disclosures in the plaint and indigency proceedings were inconsistent. The resulting non-disclosure amounted to improper conduct, so withdrawal of indigent status and liability to pay court fees were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 613 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296123</link>
      <description>Permission to sue as an indigent person may be withdrawn under Order XXXIII, Rule 9 CPC where the plaintiff suppresses material assets or makes incorrect disclosures about means. &quot;Sufficient means&quot; includes realizable assets capable of being converted into cash for payment of court fees, not only ready cash. On the material relied upon, the plaintiff had undisclosed inherited immovable property, admitted shares of value, and income from tuition work, while the disclosures in the plaint and indigency proceedings were inconsistent. The resulting non-disclosure amounted to improper conduct, so withdrawal of indigent status and liability to pay court fees were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>