https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296122 Mandatory statutory notice and proper joinder of all trustees were required for a suit against the trust, and a post-institution notice did not cure the defect. The damages claim was also treated as time-barred because it arose from the first refusal of account access and had already been litigated on the same factual basis. The bank and trust were found to have acted bona fide in relying on the deceased's Will and the succession certificate obtained under the Administrator General framework, with no illegal or mala fide conduct proved. The plaintiff also failed to establish evidence of damage, entitlement to terminal benefits, or any other recoverable amount, so no relief was available. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jul 2021 17:26:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296122 Mandatory statutory notice and proper joinder of all trustees were required for a suit against the trust, and a post-institution notice did not cure the defect. The damages claim was also treated as time-barred because it arose from the first refusal of account access and had already been litigated on the same factual basis. The bank and trust were found to have acted bona fide in relying on the deceased's Will and the succession certificate obtained under the Administrator General framework, with no illegal or mala fide conduct proved. The plaintiff also failed to establish evidence of damage, entitlement to terminal benefits, or any other recoverable amount, so no relief was available. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296122